Friday, February 25, 2011

VIRTUE, HAPPINESS AND ALL THAT STUFF

WHAT IS VIRTUE, WHAT IS TOO MUCH, WHAT IS TOO LITTLE?

On my walk this morning I thought about “virtue” as a subject to write about. Don’t ask me where the idea came from. If I had a religious soul, I would say God spoke to me. Whether one is religious or agnostic has nothing to do with virtue. It’s a false concept that only the religious are virtuous. Anyway, as I gathered my info, I soon realized what a bucket of worms I opened up. Hardly anyone is in agreement with a solid set of virtues, and what one virtue means to one person does not necessarily agree with another.
Say virtue to a hundred people and it will spark a hundred different things in their minds. Of course that depends on the mix of people. If done in a church, it might not be such a variety as it would be if you asked an odd gathering of women or a group of all men. Personally, to me, as well as many others, it might spark and image of a virtuous woman, or in these days, a young woman, a very young woman, maybe a child woman. It’s no secret that a large percentage of good girls lose their virtue/innocents at a younger and younger age. It seems like they are in competition for earning a merit badge for Bad Girl of the year. Girls of today are far worse about bragging about their conquests than were boys of yesteryear.
It is a fact that Virtue has many synonyms and only a couple anonyms; most do have something to do with religion, of course. I’ll cover a few of the synonyms and both of the anonyms.
First, let me warn you that too much of a good thing is just as bad, if not worse, as too little. Be careful of committing one of the seven deadly sins. If you don’t know what they are, look them up as I did. I’ll cover pride, gluttony and anger. Let’s don’t get on our high-horse about this now. Everyone breaks one or more of them on a daily basis.
Pride: or vanity: an excessive belief in one's own abilities, that interferes with the individual's recognition of the grace of God. It has been called the sin from which all others arise. Don’t hide your face now. Most everyone is guilty of this one. Remember, over kill is just as bad as under kill. Where the mean lies depends on in which group one belongs. It would be different for, say a Buddhist, a Christian, a man or a woman. Pride hides behind many masks. Denial is one of them, where one denies their abilities in the hopes of getting more praise.  Good or bad, accept it and move on. Above all try to move closer to the mean.
Gluttony: an inordinate desire to consume more than that which one requires. This is something the good old U S of A has grown famous for. Of course this could refer to something other than food; things, like money, having a car or house that exceeds one’s requirements. For instance, a large percentage of televangelist and other church leaders are blatantly guilty of gluttony. Yet one can tell by the enthusiastic manner they go after their wish to stuff their gluttonous coffers. Either they know not what they are doing or just don’t give a damn.
Large number of their flocks are shamed into giving to their cause more than their fair share. This is an example of too much on one end (the televangelists) and too little or too much on the other end (the poor lost sheep) who can’t afford what they give but, because of shame, they take away from themselves or their families to add more riches to the scum buckets i.e. the televangelists.  It really makes me physically ill at some of the high pressure sales tactics these ungodly, so-called preachers of God’s words are committing. You would swear you were watching one of those sales channels. “This item will only be open for another five minutes. Hurry now. God doesn’t want his followers to hesitate. Fear not, your seed will grow and prosper.” I keep saying I’m going to stop watching them, but I don’t. Does that make me guilty of self punishment?
They are mesmerizing and one is quickly drawn into them, for whatever reason; mine is to see just how far these gluttonous shysters carry on their antics. I watched one just the other day repeatedly jump up and down like a school girl as he held a check in his raised hand and shouted with glee, “ten thousand dollars, ten thousand dollars,” as he danced in a circle. The check was from a couple who had just lost their son and felt obliged to make a contribution. I wondered. About the Televangelist: about the couple: about the son? Did each achieve their happiness?
Anger/wrath: is manifested in the individual who spurns love and opts instead for fury. Even God is guilty of committing this one. At least I’ve heard the phrase many times about God inflicting his wrath on someone. I have seen many places in His book where his anger did not warrant his wrath. From the incident in the garden onward. Then the New Testament came along and made an attempt to smooth it out. I don’t want to get into all that. Here again, no anger at all is not good either. Yet mediocrity, according to His Son’s teachings, is like warm water to be spit out. But where is the middle ground? It could be different form one group to another, or it could be something to not even consider; like God’s wrath.
Aristotle defined a virtue as a balance point between a deficiency and an excess of a trait. The point of greatest virtue lies not in the exact middle, but at a golden mean sometimes closer to one extreme than the other. For example, courage is the mean between cowardice and foolhardiness, confidence the mean between self-deprecation and vanity, and generosity the mean between miserliness and extravagance.
Virtue is the rational attainment of or recognizing certain facts of morality, and acting in and appropriate way. It involves thinking and acting. While a Muslim would feel comfortable within his realm of morality to have his wife stoned for unfaithfulness and feel no guilt while a Christian might fear the fires of hell if he merely slapped the snot out of his wife for committing the same offence.
According to some, there is only one basic virtue; rationality. All others are various forms of it.  We have covered a few above. Here are a few more: independence, honesty,  truth, courage justice, and the pursuit of happiness. How much or how little one contributes to each depends on your moral nature. That is something one gains or learns while growing into maturity. Yet it is something malleable and can be adjusted.
The opposite of virtue is vice, evil, watch it or you might end up in the wrong place, if that is your beliefs.
What does one gain from being virtuous? Why, happiness. Happiness is long lasting i.e., it’s being in love with living. Just don’t overdo it. Going around giggling with a dreamy light in your eyes tends to set people wondering. Let’s not get too kinky here.
To some happiness is gained through vice and evil among other things, all of which have nothing to do with virtue.
Build confidence and discover the virtues that allow you to achieve the things that make you happy.
I checked out some lists of virtues from several famous people. Here is the one I like best.
Benjamin Franklin’s 13 Virtues
  1. Temperance: Eat not to Dullness. Drink not to Elevation.
  2. Silence: Speak not but what may benefit others or yourself. Avoid trifling Conversation.
  3. Order: Let all your Things have their Places. Let each Part of your Business have its Time.
  4. Resolution: Resolve to perform what you ought. Perform without fail what you resolve.
  5. Frugality: Make no Expense but to do good to others or yourself; i.e. Waste nothing.
  6. Industry: Lose no Time. Be always employed in something useful. Cut off all unnecessary Actions.
  7. Sincerity: Use no hurtful Deceit. Think innocently and justly; and, if you speak, speak accordingly.
  8. Justice: Wrong none, by doing Injuries or omitting the Benefits that are your Duty.
  9. Moderation: Avoid Extremes. Forbear resenting Injuries so much as you think they deserve.
  10. Cleanliness: Tolerate no Uncleanness in Body, Clothes or Habitation.
  11. Tranquility: Be not disturbed at Trifles, or at Accidents common or unavoidable.
  12. Chastity: Rarely use Venery but for Health or Offspring; Never to Dullness, Weakness, or the Injury of your own or another's Peace or Reputation.
  13. Humility: Imitate Jesus and Socrates.
See there. Only one reference hints at religion. Remember, everything in moderation. You be the judge. We all know when we go out of bounds, when we do too much and when we do too little. Your God doesn’t have to be watching.


Friday, February 18, 2011

The Bible, God, Creation, Flawed Stock


SOME QUESTIONS

According to the Bible and most religious people, God created the world, the universe, whether it was10 thousand years ago or over 10 billion years ago. Okay, let’s take that as a fact. Although, I think more of us believe in the big band theory.  For whom did he create all this? For everyone in this world? For everyone in the universe, if there is anyone else out there? For the Jews? For the Christians? For the Muslims? For the Hindus, etc, etc, etc? Did He mean for there to be an Under-God for each religion? Did He also create these Gods? Did he mean for there to be one Bible? Or did he want for Man, as a collective, to make the Good Book into what Man wanted it to be; as it is now?
It seems to me, and according to Moses, our great one God only meant for the Bible to be for the Jews, his chosen people, who he led throughout the land to slaughter all who held His people in slavery, every man woman, child and baby. All, of course, except for the virgins that is, divide all their riches, their cows, their sheep, their slaves. Does this sound like a loving God? Why is the Old Testament even a part of the Bible? It’s filled with horror stories. It turns my stomach reading it. But then, I guess it’s no worse than what one finds in the news papers of today. I don’t read them anymore, nor do I watch that crap on The Tube.
This God depicted in the Bible made a big mistake when He created his first 2 beings. He made everything perfect  except the main characters. Was he tired from his work when it was time to do His greatest creation? He flawed them and then cursed them to suffer for His mistake. It’s just not logical for a god capable of creating a universe to start off with flawed stock. If one is setting up a farm to raise cattle or sheep, isn’t it logical to start off with the best stock available? And is the stock is not good, whose fault is it? You sure don’t go out in the herd and start kicking around the poor animals for not going or doing what you want them to do without any guidance. A good Sheppard must guide his flock.  
 And then, family members began killing each other. Does any of this sound logical? Again this is the Sheppard’s fault. One must teach his young bulls not to fight or trim their horns so they cannot hurt each other.
Just some food for thought. These are just a small part of what turned me against religion and the so called Good Book. Have a pleasant day.

Monday, February 7, 2011

CONFESSIONS OF A NONBELIEVER


THEIST, ATHEIST OR AGNOSTIC, FANATICS OR COWARDS?
Theists are religious fanatics. The opposite of theist, atheist, is also a class of fanatics. Between these two extremes lays the realm of the agnostics. Like the thousands of different religious sects and groups around the world, agnostics are subdivided into many levels of disbelief, all hated and kicked around by atheists and theists alike. They call us cowards, fence-sitters, wishy-washy and lazy, to name a few of the less derogatory. Although I hate being labeled, I am forced into being called an agnostic, even though there is no comfortable sect for me within this group.
Theists, especially Christians warn us that we are going to burn in hell if we don’t change our heathen ways, and then they threaten to pray for us, both of which mean little to a nonbeliever. They are going to prey to a god we don’t believe in? They want to scare us into reverting to theism not realizing most agnostics have been down that road? Don’t get me wrong, not all theists are like this. There are some with whom one can have a calm, intelligent conversation with.
Atheists tell us “ get off the fence and man up. You know there’s no god out there.”
“No. I don’t. Prove it to me.”
I’d rather listen to a theist try to prove that God does exist, even though I lean toward the atheist’s point of view. Theist cannot get past “it’s in the Bible” stage. And this is so very simple to disprove to a logical person, not that all theist are illogical. It’s impossible to break them away from their brainwashed beliefs in the Bible. But then, who would want to. Certainly not me. Having beliefs that firmly entrenched is admirable whether or not they are wrong. If it makes their lives easier and happier,  what’s the harm? If they are correct, hallelujah. No one is going to get lonely in hell. If not, who’s going to know the difference?
I’m not seeking to build up a group of followers or even trying to add to the expanding group of the nonreligious who, by the way, now rank third on Religions by Adherents Chart. In the last ten years it has passed Hinduism and is quickly gaining ground on Muslims and Christianity. Here are the first 4 on the list.    
Christianity 33% steady
Muslims 21% up 1.4%
Nonreligious 16% up 3.3%
Hinduism 14% up .6%

Atheists have a firm belief that no god or gods exists. The big bang happened and here we are 13.75 billion years, plus or minus a few days, later. He really has nothing to prove. Anyone has the right to not believe what he/she wishes.
Theists however, believe in their God. Makes no difference if others believe in what is supposed to be the same god only in different ways. The God of the Bible is one god, correct? Yet, different religions and sects have split him up until there is nothing left of the original God. This has been something I could never figure out when I was a believer. But now I know why.
However, if someone believes in something he/she must be prepared to prove, logically, the existence of whatever it is. I believe there are few theists who are prepared to attempt this without using the bible or making reference to it. I have found proof, to my satisfaction, the bible is a fake. To my way of thinking, this means that the God of the Bible doesn’t and never has existed. This is fodder for another article.
Therefore, the agnostic in me is, I don’t believe in the God of the Bible. I don’t deny there may be a god out there somewhere and maybe he/she/it is not ready to reveal his/her/its self to us and probably never will. Scientist’s explanation of the big band theory is no more logical than the theist’s believe their god created it all. So, believe in what you like. I am now content in mine. I write of my agnostic ways in hope of providing to others who, like me, have been or are stuck in limbo. Limbo, the purgatory of not knowing.